People v. Edwards
Illinois Supreme Court
1Concurrence
JUSTICE FITZGERALD,
specially concurring:
I agree with the majority that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing the defendant’s post-conviction petition. I write separately to discuss the confusion surrounding so-called first-stage dismissals under section 122 — 2.1(a)(2) of the Act. Understandably, there is great reluctance to accept dismissal of a petition filed by an indigent defendant without the benefit of counsel. This reluctance, and the vague language contained in section 122 — 2.1, have led to the use of the terms “gist” and “low threshold” in an effort to define the first-stage…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.