Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Edwards

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2001No. 87930Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE FITZGERALD,

specially concurring:

I agree with the majority that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing the defendant’s post-conviction petition. I write separately to discuss the confusion surrounding so-called first-stage dismissals under section 122 — 2.1(a)(2) of the Act. Understandably, there is great reluctance to accept dismissal of a petition filed by an indigent defendant without the benefit of counsel. This reluctance, and the vague language contained in section 122 — 2.1, have led to the use of the terms “gist” and “low threshold” in an effort to define the first-stage…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API