Legal Opinion

County of Sonoma v. Sanborn

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1934No. Civ. 5242PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the issuing of Analy Union High School District bonds in the principal sum of $160,000, pursuant to the provisions of section 4.966 of the School Code, as validated and existing obligations against the school district, having been duly authorized by that district by a two-thirds vote of the electors thereof at an election called and held therein for that purpose as required by the provisions of part V, chapter I, of the School Code.

The respondent concedes that all of the allegations of the petition are true, and that “in all respects . . .…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seymour v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. In Re East Bay Etc. Water Bonds of 1925California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Scilley v. Red Lodge-Rosebud Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Weisgerber v. Nez Perce CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. McLoughlin v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Berkeley v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  2. County of Sacramento v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Chrysler Corporation v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  4. People v. City of CarlsbadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. State v. County of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API