Legal Opinion

Kopel v. Kopel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 11, 2002No. 3D02-983PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

832 So.2d 108 (2002)

Leon KOPEL, Petitioner,

v.

Bernardo KOPEL, et al., Respondents.

No. 3D02-983.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 22, 2002.

Specially Concurring Opinion on Denial of Rehearing December 11, 2002.

Law Offices of Paul Morris, and Paul Morris, and Josephs, Jack, Miranda, McCulough & McKeown, and Stephanie E. Demos, for petitioner.

Heller and Kaplan, and Daniel Neal Heller, for respondent.

Before COPE, SHEVIN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.

Specially Concurring Opinion on Denial of Rehearing En Banc December 11, 2002.

2Per curiam 1

Leon Kopel petitions for a writ of prohibition to prevent the…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Borden, Inc. v. YoungDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Chastine v. BroomeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Sparks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Perriman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Auerbach v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Masten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Molina v. PerezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. Copiers Intrn. Corp. v. All American Business Systems, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API