Legal Opinion

Masten v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 20, 2015No. 3D14-0817PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLogue, J.

Richard Masten seeks a writ of prohibition contending the trial judge erred in denying his motion to disqualify. We find the motion was legally sufficient to require recusal.

Masten was charged with direct criminal contempt, found guilty, and sentenced to probation. He moved for a stay of his sentence, which was denied. He then sought review of the denial. In the meantime, Masten was charged with violating his probation.

On learning that Masten sought review of the denial' of the stay, the trial judge sent the Attorney General’s Office a twenty-one paragraph email containing various arguments…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Kopel v. KopelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. Great American Insurance Co. of New York v. 2000 Island Boulevard Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. Rollins v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. OliuDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Nguyen v. NguyenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ v. ROHAN HALSALLDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
  4. Bank of America v. AtkinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Benjamin Shabtai v. Stacey Cooper ShabtaiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API