Legal Opinion

detroit/wayne County Stadium Authority v. 7631 Lewiston, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1999No. Docket 208129PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBandstra, C.J.

Plaintiff appeals by leave granted from the trial court’s orders granting defendant’s motion to require plaintiff to amend its complaints in this action brought under the Uniform Condemnation Procedures Act (ucpa), MCL 213.51 el seq.; MSA 8.265(1) el seq. The trial court concluded that plaintiff’s good-faith offers failed to comply with the UCPA because each offer combined an amount considered to be just compensation for the subject parcel with an amount offered as an incentive to allow plaintiff to purchase the property without need for a condemnation action. As a result, after plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Froede v. Holland Ladder & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Stabley v. Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Park AuthorityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. City of Flint v. PatelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Department of Transportation v. RobinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Department of Transportation v. PichalskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jager v. Nationwide Truck Brokers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Alibri v. Detroit/Wayne County Stadium AuthorityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API