Legal Opinion
City of Flint v. Patel
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 1, 1993No. Docket 133183PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Defendant, Ramesh Patel, appeals as of right the trial court’s order denying his motion to compel the payment of attorney fees in this eminent domain case. We reverse.
The underlying facts are undisputed. Plaintiff, City of Flint, initially made defendant an offer for his medical clinic in June 1985. The offer included amounts for irremovable fixtures and the real estate, but made no provision for removable fixtures. Defendant did not accept the offer, and in March 1986 the city filed a condemnation action under the provisions of the Uniform Condemnation Procedures Act, MCL 213.51 et seq.; MSA…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Schmude Oil Co. v. Omar Operating Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Baxter v. Gates Rubber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Department of Transportation v. RobinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McAuley v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Department of Transportation v. RandolphMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Condemnation of PropertyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- City of Detroit v. Larned AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Advanced Accessory Systems, LLC v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.