Legal Opinion

Moe v. Sex Offender Registry Board

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 28, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After we transferred the case here on our own motion, the board “reissued” its classification decision, and informed Moe that it would not contest the timeliness of any new complaint for judicial review that Moe might file within thirty days of his receipt of the reissued classification decision. Thereafter, the board moved to dismiss Moe’s appeal on the ground that it was moot. Moe received the reissued decision on March 21, 2005, after which he filed a motion in the Superior Court seeking an enlargement of time to file a complaint for judicial review of the reissued decision until after…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stowe v. BolognaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Metros v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. In the Matter of SturtzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Stowe v. BolognaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  5. Vigoda v. Superintendent of Boston State HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. Department of Telecommunications & CableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. Soe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Callahan v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Polices and BondsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  4. Hoffer v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Callahan v. Board of Appeals on Motor Vehicle Liability & BondsMassachusetts Superior Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API