Legal Opinion

City of Fargo v. Ovind

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1998No. Criminal 970198PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAKING, Justice.

[¶ 1] After entering a conditional guilty plea to driving under the influence, Mark Bjorn Ovind appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress evidence. We conclude the officer was justified in subjecting Ovind to a limited investigative stop for the purpose of “freezing” the situation at the scene of a reported fight. The officer, therefore, had a reasonable and artic-ulable suspicion to stop Ovind’s car. We affirm the district court’s order denying Ovind’s motion to suppress.

I

[¶ 2] In the early morning hours, shortly before 1:45 a.m., on January 17,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. ComenOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. LangsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. City of Jamestown v. JeromeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. FieldsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. BoydNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Lapp v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API