Legal Opinion

In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 14, 2008No. 21 MC 92(SAS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs move for an order compelling discovery of certain memoranda. Defendant Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (“Credit Suisse”) opposes on the ground that the memoranda are protected as attorney work product. For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs’ motion is granted.

II. BACKGROUND1

In December 1999, Credit Suisse’s general counsel for the Americas began an internal inquiry into alleged misconduct related to the allocation of shares during initial public offerings.2 To assist in this inquiry, Credit Suisse retained…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gucci America, Inc. v. Guess?, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. United States v. GhavamiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Complex Systems, Inc. v. ABN AMRO Bank N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Ashton v. Al Qaeda IslamicDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. Gruss v. ZwirnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API