Legal Opinion

United States v. Earl Martin and De Berard Cattle Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1959No. 5960PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court allowing appellees to jointly intervene, and from a judgment on De Berard Cattle Company’s counterclaim, in this declaratory class action by the United States, for an adjudication of the respective rights of the affected parties, to the use of water of the Colorado River, arising out of the Colorado Big-Thompson diversion project.

This project had for its primary objective the diversion of the waters of the Colorado River from the Western Slope to the Eastern Slope of the Rockies for irrigation purposes, by means of a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, and Cross-Appellant v. Gladys N. Waller, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  2. Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. Grace United Methodist Church v. City of CheyenneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Grace United Methodist Church v. City Of CheyenneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, and City and County of Denver, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API