Legal Opinion
United States v. Thompson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 19, 2010No. 09-1926PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYKES, Circuit Judge.
Christopher Thompson violated the conditions of his supervised release in late February 2009, and the district court held a revocation hearing in March of that year. Rule 32.1(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure establishes the procedures that apply in a supervised-release revocation hearing, and the judge followed these procedures — with one exception. Although Thompson, his attorney, and the prosecutor were present in the federal courthouse in Rockford, Illinois, the judge participated via video-conference from Key West, Florida. Thompson’s appeal requires…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Terrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Walter BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Gregory BetheaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Federal Trade Commission v. TrudeauCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. David Shanks, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.