Legal Opinion
Terrell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 26, 2009No. 07-2546PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
This case presents the federal courts of appeals with an issue of first impression. Can the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”) use videoconferencing to conduct parole determination proceedings? Habeas petitioner Sammy Terrell challenged this practice as a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4208(e) and his due process rights under the Fifth Amendment, and he prevailed in the district court on due process grounds. We conclude that the statute requires parole determination proceedings to be held in person, and so for the following reasons, affirm the judgment of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- Craig Wilson v. Mark WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Michigan Flyer LLC v. Wayne County Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Michael Bailey v. Lyneal WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Adams v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.