Legal Opinion

Fiumara v. American Surety Co. of New York

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 1943No. Appeal, 226PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxby,

This is an appeal from the judgment entered by the court below after a trial without a jury. Appellant alleges that a contractor paid for materials furnished a sub-contractor after the materialman had lost his right of action on the contractor’s bond by failing to institute suit thereon within the statutory year for such suit and that therefore such payment by the contractor was made too late to permit the contractor to recover the amount so paid from the surety or the sub-contractor’s bond of indemnity. The limitation here invoked arises by reason of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Malley v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Western & A. Pipe Lines v. Home Ins., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1891
  4. Trustees of Methodist Episcopal Church of Franklin v. Equitable Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. South Phila. State Bank v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Almeida v. BaldiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  2. Chavez v. ChenowethNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Brunswick Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Outboard CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  4. Garden State Tanning, Inc. v. Mitchell Mfg. Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. Robinson v. Trenton Dressed Poultry Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API