Sargent v. Lambert Const. Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action by a lower property owner against an upper property owner for interfering with and channeling the natural drainage of water. The court found in favor of defendant. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court misapplied the law to the facts. We find that the trial court did so err and we reverse.
The trial court made the following finding of fact:
Both the plaintiff and defendant's lots are located within the corporate limits of the City of Montgomery. The plaintiff is the lower land owner and the defendant owns property above the plaintiff's lot; however, the properties are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gins v. Mauser Plumbing Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Rushing v. Hooper-McDonald, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Kay-Noojin Development Co. v. KinzerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Kay-Noojin Development Co. v. HackettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- City of Mountain Brook v. BeattySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kennedy v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- City of Birmingham v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Robichaux v. AFBIC Development Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Fisher v. Space of Pensacola, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Johnson v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.