Legal Opinion

Hauge v. Chicago

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 4, 1937No. 175PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

Appellant, while residing at Morris, Illinois, engaged in trucking coal for hire from a mine near that place sixty-two miles over public roads to Chicago where he delivered it to consumers. He both owned and drove the truck.

The Revised Statutes of Illinois, (1935) c. 24, Art. Y, §§ 54, 55, 56, 91, give cities power to regulate inspection, weighing and measuring of coal, inspection and sealing of weights, measures, etc. Chapter 147 provides for inspecting and sealing scales by State officers; but no law permits designation of State weighmasters.

Chicago by ordinance has authorized the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Armour & Co. v. North DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. City of Chicago v. Wisconsin Lime & Cement Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chicago Park District v. Kenroy, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. FerrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Blumenthal v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Sverkerson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Kirwin v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API