Commonwealth v. Ferris
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The defendant, describing himself as a dispensing optician, advertised in a newspaper over his name and address as follows: "Eyeglasses complete! White single vision lenses and frames. Complete for only $5. Your choice of ten modern style frames only $2.50. We believe our prices to be those below any competitor.”
G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 112, § 73A, inserted by St. 1937, c. 287, provides that no person, in connection with the sale of eyeglasses, lenses or eyeglass frames, shall include in any advertisement (a) "any statement advertising a frame or mounting at a fixed price unless a further…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- New State Ice Co. v. LiebmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Pacific States Box & Basket Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Commonwealth v. Town of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Merit Oil Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- State v. RonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.