Legal Opinion

Bell Aircraft Corp. v. Board of Assessors

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. O’Bbien, J.

This is a motion by Bell Aircraft Corporation (a) to consolidate three separate proceedings to review tax assessments for the years 1951, 1952 and 1953, and (b) to examine the assessors and their records before trial, under either section 288 or section 292-a of the Civil Practice Act. There is no objection to the consolidation of said proceedings and an order to that effect has already been signed.

*952The board of assessors object to the granting of an order requiring them to submit to the requested examination before trial as to the following matters:(1) All relevant and competent facts and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Haile v. BrundageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Deutsch v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Mitchell v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Mitchell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  5. People ex rel. Green v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C. H. O. B. Associates, Inc. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Limerick v. FitzgeraldNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Carlson v. PodeynNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API