Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1942PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

This is an application by the plaintiff for an order to examine before trial two employees of the defendant, namely, a porter employed in the subway system, designated by name and number, and the station master in charge of one of its subway stations, where the accident in question occurred. Chapter 921 of the Laws of 1941, in effect May 1, 1941, added a new section to the Civil Practice Act, i. e., section 292-a, entitled “ Order for taking testimony of municipal corporation in certain cases,” and reads as follows: “ Where a cause of action is asserted against a muniqipal corporation arising…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ward v. Iroquois Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Shaw v. Samley Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lea v. LeaNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Bell Aircraft Corp. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Mitchell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API