Legal Opinion

Thomas & Betts Co. v. Electrical Fittings Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 12, 1938PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs brought the usual action in equity against the defendants in the District Court for the Southern District of New York charging, infringement of claims 1 and 2 of the United States Patent No. 1,769,947 granted to Fullman.

After hearing, the court held claim 1 of the patent valid but not infringed and claim 2 invalid. A final decree to this effect with a consequent dismissal of the bill of complaint was entered April 27, 1938. The plaintiffs took no appeal from the decree but on June 28, 1938 the defendants filed a petition for appeal and an order allowing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. New York Telephone Co. v. MaltbieSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Oliver-Sherwood Co. v. Patterson-Ballagh CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. New Orleans v. EmsheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. P. E. Sharpless Co. v. William A. Lawrence & SonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1913

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Harries v. Air King Products Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  4. Galloway v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  5. Hazeltine Corp. v. Crosley Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API