Legal Opinion

New York Telephone Co. v. Maltbie

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 19, 1934No. 586PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Per curiam

The District Court, specially constituted as required by statute (28 U.S.C. 380), permanently enjoined, as confiscatory, the enforcement of the rate orders which are the subject of this suit. The injunction is unqualified. Appellant, having obtained this relief, is not entitled to prosecute an appeal from the decree in its favor, for the purpose of reviewing the portions of the decree fixing the value of appellant’s property as of the years 1924,1926, and 1928, and the rate of return to be allowed. The matters set forth in these portions of the decree are not to be regarded as res judicata in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. State Corporation Comm'n of Kan. v. Wichita Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Anglo-American Provision Co. v. Davis Provision Co. No. 2Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. New Orleans v. EmsheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Camreta v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Partmar Corp. v. Paramount Pictures Theatres Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Plinton v. County of SummitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Chicago ClubCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API