Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Power House Development Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to foreclose a vendee’s lien to recover a down payment made on a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J), dated August 29, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion to cancel their notice of pendency.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the notice of pendency is reinstated.
The defendant moved to cancel the plaintiffs’ notice of pendency (see CPLR 6501). However, the plaintiffs seek, inter alia, to foreclose a vendee’s lien to recover a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Da Silva v. MussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Interboro Operating Corp. v. Commonwealth Security & Mortgage Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Dingley v. . BonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Macho Assets, Inc. v. Spring Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Serota v. Power House Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tilden Development Corp. v. NicajAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Washington Mutual Bank v. WadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Doyle v. HafnerNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- Neng Duan Lin v. 111-38 Management Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2009