Legal Opinion
Neng Duan Lin v. 111-38 Management Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 2009Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Charles J. Markey, J.
*457This case poses an interesting question in the interpretation of a construction contract, when the failure to finish by a designated date is caused by the alleged interference or intervention of a governmental agency.
Defendant 111-38 Management Corp. (seller) owns the property commonly known as 38-05 111th Street, Corona, New York (premises). On January 16, 2007, the seller and plaintiffs’ predecessors entered into a contract of sale whereby plaintiffs’ predecessors would acquire from seller the premises, for the purchase price of $855,000. On the same…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Chapel v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Saratoga Spa & Bath, Inc. v. Beeche Systems Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Interboro Operating Corp. v. Commonwealth Security & Mortgage Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Partrick v. GuarniereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.