Legal Opinion
Doyle v. Hafner
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 2006Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert J. Gigante, J.
Plaintiffs motion (No. 2072) to cancel the notice of pendency dated February 3, 2005 is granted; plaintiffs further motion (No. 2326) for summary judgment is granted, in part, and denied, in part, as indicated herein.
Plaintiff Ryan Doyle moves by notice of motion for an order (1) cancelling, striking and discharging of record the notice of pendency filed by defendant Cheryl Hafner on or about February 3, 2005, and (2) awarding him the costs, expenses, disbursements and legal fees incurred in obtaining such relief. Doyle also moves by notice of motion…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Brand v. PrinceNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Di Leo v. Pecksto Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.