Legal Opinion

Durham v. McDowell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 16, 1924No. 1652PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

, HIGGINS, J.

J. Durham, S. L. Pierce, W. D. Gaston, and J. L. McDowell executed a promissory note in tlie sum of $300, to the order of the First National Bank of Asper-mont. There is nothing upon the face of the note to indicate that any of the makers signed as sureties. Shortly after maturity -the note was indorsed by the payee to the order of Gaston and McDowell without recourse; the latter paying to the payee said sum of money. Thereupon Gaston and McDowell brought this suit against Durham and Pierce to recover the amount paid, with interest and attorney’s fees, as provided in the note,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Security Nat. Bank of Dallas v. KynerdTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Brokaw v. CollettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. F & a Equipment Leasing, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  2. Caldwell v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Moore v. B. & M. Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Redford v. Crowe's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Shearer v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API