McMillan v. Shadow Ridge at Oak Park Homeowner's Assn.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERREN, J.
Over 140 years ago, our Supreme Court stated, “A party to an action may appear in his own proper person or by attorney, but he cannot do both.” (Board of Commissioners v. Younger (1865) 29 Cal. 147, 149.) The wisdom of this holding is made evident by the case before us.
A plaintiff, having twice been represented by counsel and having twice ended that relationship, represents herself. On the sidelines is a lawyer, not of record, who informs counsel for defendant that he will be making limited appearances in deposition and other unspecified matters for plaintiff. Time for trial…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Board of Commissioners (No. 2) v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Chambers v. KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Koo v. Rubio's Restaurants, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- HTC CORP. v. Technology Properties Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- People v. MorelosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- United States v. Sierra Pacific IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Disability Services Corp. v. Butterfield CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Syre v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024