Legal Opinion

Koo v. Rubio's Restaurants, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 2003No. G031093PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

An attorney representing a corporate defendant in a class action lawsuit concerning overtime wages for managers declared before the court that his firm represented both the defendant and its managers. He later clarified that his only intention in so declaring was to put opposing counsel on notice that the defendant corporation’s managerial agents were “represented parties” to the extent provided in State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct, mle 2-100, 1 but that he certainly did not mean to convey the impression that he represented the managers in their individual capacities. Of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fox v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Responsible Citizens v. SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Chronometrics, Inc. v. Sysgen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Civil Service Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Aguilar v. LernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Clark v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Robert Radcliffe v. Experian Info. SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Banning Ranch Conservancy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API