Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Remaly

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Clinton; Daboll, J. Bill by Oliver B. Campbell and others against Frank Remaly and others in aid of execution. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Complainants are bankers, and, in 1894, extended credit to defendants Frank and Albert Remaly, and, on the 30th of December, 1895, obtained a *215judgment upon their demand, amounting to $765.76. Prior to the 29th of June, 1895, the defendant Prank Remaly appeared by the record to be the owner of 120 acres of land in Clinton county. On that date there was placed of record a deed of an undivided one-half of these premises, running to his wife, Nina Remaly, which deed bore date April 12, 1888. Subsequently, on the 1st of July, 1895, there was placed of record a mortgage from Prank Remaly to his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cutler v. SteeleMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Wooden v. WoodenMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Michigan Trust Co. v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Esper v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Reed v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Barkworth v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Lingle v. Owosso Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Bullard v. AveryMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API