Legal Opinion

Brigham v. Fawcett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1880PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court of Detroit. Bill to set aside a deed. Complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

In 1877 the complainants credited the defendant Bobert Fawcett with a bill of goods amounting to about $300. At that time and up to March 6, 1878, he owned and occupied as a homestead a portion of a city lot in Detroit. At the date last named he quit-claimed the premises to his wife, the defendant Mary, but the occupation as a homestead has continued without interruption. The debt to complainants remaining unpaid, they sued the defendant Bobert, in December, 1878, to collect it, and in the succeeding January obtained judgment. The damages were $323.20, and costs $22.35. Execution was taken…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. BowmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Darling v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Roberts v. MilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Allen v. AntisdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jones v. BrandtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  2. Brown v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Belding Savings Bank v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hicks v. McLachlanMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Cole v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API