Newlove v. Callaghan
Michigan Supreme Court
Application for rehearing.
1Opinion of the CourtMcG-rath, J.
Defendants move for a rehearing upon the ground that,- defendants' answer being under oath, there was a conclusive showing that the property in question was purchased chiefly with the money of defendant Elizabeth Callaghan.
A sworn answer is not conclusive. It is to be treated as evidence, and is subject to the same rules, as to weight, as any other evidence. In Roberts v. Miles, 12 Mich. 297, 303, this Court, referring'to a sworn answer, say:
“The answer was not excepted to, but, in considering its value as a piece of testimony, it is to be observed that the object of a discovery is to be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Roberts v. MilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by9 opinions
- Boddy v. HenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Jaffe v. AckermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Matter of IgnasiakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
- Foster v. WhelpleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Nino v. MoyerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.