Legal Opinion
Manzon v. Stant Corp.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided March 30, 2001No. IP 99-1789-C-B/SPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Peter Manzon was an executive employee at Defendant Stant Corporation (“Stant”) from October of 1996 to spring of 1999. The terms of his employment were governed by an Employment Agreement. Soon after Manzon’s employment was terminated in 1999, he filed suit against Stant alleging that Stant failed to honor its obli gations under the Employment Agreement and that Stant violated certain wage laws in effect in Indiana.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Timothy Herremans v. Carrera Designs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Die & Mold, Inc. v. WesternIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Gurnik v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Huff v. BIOMET, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Midland-Guardian Co. v. United Consumers Club, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harney v. Speedway SuperAmerica, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Whitlock v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Klinker v. First Merchants Bank, N.A.Indiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Thomas v. H & R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.