Legal Opinion

Capitol Building & Loan Ass'n v. Ross

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 30, 1932No. 30,100PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action, to foreclose real-estate mortgages— two mortgages on the same real property, to the same mortgagee, foreclosed in the same action. The trial court made findings of fact and rendered judgment for plaintiff. The point presented here may be made clear by setting out the fourth finding, which is as follows:

“4. The court further finds that the mortgages set out in plaintiff’s first and second causes of action are mortgages securing contract notes of even date; that the contract note in the fifth provision in each purports to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sheakley v. MechlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. Owsley v. NeevesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  3. Schultz v. StinerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Bankers Mortgage Co. v. RobsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Smith v. ShaverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hall v. GoldsworthySupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Broadhurst Foundation v. New Hope Baptist SocietySupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Balcor Pension Investors v v. Wiston XXIV Ltd. (In Re Wiston XXIV Ltd.)District Court, D. Kansas · 1992
  4. Rives v. Mincks Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. In Re Barkley 3A Investors, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API