Starr v. Brotherhood's Relief & Compensation Fund
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentTongue, J.
I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because of my belief that: (1) the majority gives the term “willfully or intentionally” a meaning more limited than is proper for the purposes of this ease, and (2) the majority fails to recognize that whether plaintiff acted “willfully or intentionally” is a question of fact upon which there was substantial evidence to support the finding by an able and experienced trial judge.
1. A refusal to obey an order in good faith belief that the order was improper is not “willful or intentional” for the purposes of forfeiting payments due under…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wampler v. PalmertonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Richards v. Griffith Rubber MillsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
- Chaffin v. ChaffinOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Falls v. MortensenOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Everding & Farrell v. ToftOregon Supreme Court · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.