Legal Opinion

Pellett v. Sonotone Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1942No. Civ. 13731PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J.—From

a judgment in favor of defendants after trial before a jury predicated upon the granting of defendants’ motions for nonsuits on the grounds that:(1) Plaintiff’s cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations (subd. 3, § 340, Code Civ. Proc.), and(2) The evidence failed to disclose negligence on the part of defendants or either of them,

plaintiff appeals. The action is one for damages resulting from the alleged negligence of defendants in failing to remove from plaintiff’s ear all of the plaster of Paris used in making a cast thereof.

Viewing the evidence in the light…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ehlen v. BurrowsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Petrucci v. HeidenreichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Pellett v. Sonotone Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Seitz v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Myers v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API