Rassa v. Rollins Protective Services Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SMALKIN, District Judge.
The defendants, Rollins Protective Services Company and Rollins, Inc., have filed a motion to dismiss this case under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, contending that the plaintiffs, Cornelius and Irene Rassa, cannot recover in excess of the jurisdictional minimum required in a fed-' eral diversity action. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motion will be granted. The issues have been well and fully briefed, and no oral hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6, D. Md.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs have filed suit to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Martin Marietta Corporation v. International Telecommunications Satellite OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Annie Wiggins v. North American Equitable Life Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Liscombe v. Potomac Edison Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Assicurazioni Generali, S.P.A. v. Kenneth Neil, Assicurazioni Generali, S.P.A. v. Kenneth NeilCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Casey v. Geek Squad® Subsidiary Best Buy Stores, L.P.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- McDonald Bros., Inc. v. Tinder Wholesale, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Rice v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Lawson v. ADT Security Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.