Legal Opinion
McKinley v. Casson
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided October 31, 2013No. 465, 2012PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERGER, Justice:
In this appeal we consider several evi-dentiary rulings in a personal injury action arising from a motor vehicle accident. Among other things, appellant1 complains that the trial court erred in denying him access to appellee’s medical records, and that the jury should not have been allowed to learn that he was not wearing a helmet at the time of the accident. We agree, and reverse and remand for a new trial.
Factual and Procedural Background
On the evening of October 3, 2009, Robert McKinley and Michele Casson were involved in a motor vehicle accident near the base of the Summit…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dillenbeck v. HessNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Tackett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Kealoha v. County of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- JOHNSTON v. STACYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- Houston Casualty Company v. Truist Financial CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- In re Appraisal of Dole Food Company, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
- JOHNSTON v. STACYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- Level 4 Yoga, LLC v. CorePower Yoga, LLC and CorePower Yoga Franchising, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.