Legal Opinion

Earley v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2011No. S-11-0118PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[T1] The appellant was acquitted of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, but convicted of accessory before the fact to delivery of a controlled substance. The former occurred via the granting of a defense motion for judgment of acquittal made at the close of the State's case, while the latter occurred via jury verdict, In this appeal, the appellant challenges the district court's joinder of her case with that of a co-defendant, she claims error in the district court's handling of issues concerning the cross-examination of a particular witness, and she questions the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. William K. Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Burke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Pote v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Duke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Larkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Schmuck v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Ernest Ray Watts v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Sindelar v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Sparks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API