Legal Opinion

Moore v. Local 569 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1995No. 93-56717PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:

Lawrence Moore brought this action against Fischbach & Moore, Inc. (Fischbach) among others. After his action failed as to Fischbach, the district court upheld an attorneys’ fee award which was imposed upon Moore pursuant to an arbitration procedure. Moore then appealed. He raises a whole host of issues, but we find one dispositive— did the arbitration agreement’s attorneys’ fee provision apply to Moore? The answer to that question is no. We, therefore, do not decide the other issues regarding that award of fees. However, we do consider Moore’s additional claim that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Townsend v. Holman Consulting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Summit Valley Industries, Inc. v. Local 112, United Brotherhood of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Franklin L. Miller v. Los Angeles County Board of Education and Stuart E. Gothold, Los Angeles County Superintendent of SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moore v. Local 569 Of The International Brotherhood Of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API