Legal Opinion

Craig v. Pickens County

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 10, 1939No. 14805PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this controversy between Pickens County as appellant and the Sheriff of that county as respondent, the latter is claiming certain salary items which represent attempted statutory reductions of his salary below the prevailing salary at the time of his election to the office, and also certain fees connected with the handling of delinquent tax executions.

The claim to the salary items is founded upon the contention that the attempted reduction of the respondent’s salary by local statutory enactments following his election is beyond the power of the Legislature.

The tax execution fees claimed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Salley v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  2. Plowden v. Beattie, Comptroller GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  3. Gamble v. Clarendon CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  4. Salley v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  5. Ridgill v. Clarendon CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moseley v. WelchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  2. Gaud v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  3. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. O'Shields v. CaldwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  5. Henry v. Horry CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API