Piedmont & Arlington Life-Insurance v. Ewing
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller
This was an action on a policy of life-insurance issued by plaintiff in error.
The defence is, tbat tbougb plaintiff below, as administrator of Mr. Howes, whose life it purported to insure, bad received tbe policy, it was, in reality, not delivered by tbe agent until after tbe death of tbe assured, and in ignorance of tbat event. Tbis is not disputed. But plaintiff below insisted that a contract of insurance bad been made between Howes and tbe insurance company before bis death, which bound tbe company; and whether tbis was so or not is tbe principal question in tbe case.
Another defence,…
2Cited by25 opinions
- Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Lisa Lupyan v. Corinthian Colleges IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Piedmont, Etc. Life-Ins. Co. v. Ewing, Etc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. BrashearsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Walton & Co. v. BurchelTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.