Hebert v. State Ballot Law Commission
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment affirming a decision of the State Ballot Law Commission (Commission), that there were sufficient valid signatures on an initiative petition for a law “limiting state and local taxation and expenditures” (also known as Proposition 21/2), despite objections filed by the plaintiff pursuant to G. L. c. 55B, *276§ 5.2 The parties filed a statement of agreed facts, and the record of the proceedings before the Commission, including the transcript and exhibits, was admitted in evidence. We affirm.
The following facts are undisputed. The petition as filed contained 1,173…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Proskin v. MayNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Tyler v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- United Labor Committee of Mo. v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Nist v. HersethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gibbons v. State Ballot Law CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Hendrix v. JaegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Morway v. Town of WebsterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Stapleton v. NyhanMassachusetts Superior Court · 1995