Legal Opinion
Meares v. Dana Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided October 7, 2008No. COA07-1401PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
The issues presented by defendants are: (1) whether there was a change in condition such that the Industrial Commission should have changed its prior award and declared plaintiff to be permanently disabled under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-29, and (2) whether the award of attorney’s fees under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-88.1 was appropriate. As to the first issue, we conclude that there was competent evidence to support the Industrial Commission’s findings of fact, and the Industrial Commission’s conclusions of law were supported by its findings of fact and based upon a correct understanding…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Clark v. Wal-MartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- Knight v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Troutman v. White & Simpson, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Effingham v. THE KROGER CO.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Morgan v. Morgan Motor Co. of AlbemarleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Hedges v. Wake County Public School SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Clayton v. Mini Data Forms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Pait v. Southeastern General HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Blalock v. SOUTHEASTERN MATERIALCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.