Legal Opinion
Francese v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 6, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*226In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendants City of Mount Vernon and City of Mount Vernon Water Department appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered September 7, 1990, which granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim upon them and to amend the complaint to assert a cause of action against them.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.
The plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim was not made until after the expiration of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Luka v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Luka v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Gross v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Hochberg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zaiman v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Dockery v. Department of Housing Preservation & Development of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996