Smith v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinton op .the Court by
Chiep Justioe Hurt—
Affirming.
Paul Smith was indicted for the offense of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors. A trial resulted in a verdict of guilty by the jury, which, also, fixed his penalty at a fine of $200.00 and imprisonment for a period of thirty days in the county jail, and a judgment was rendered accordingly. A new trial was refused, and he has appealed from the judgment. He relies for reversal of the judgment upon a single ground, and that is, he insists, that the court erred to the prejudice of his substantial rights in overruling a motion made by him to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dials v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- State v. LipscombSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Lovelace v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Union Central Life Insurance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WirthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. KrogerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Marcum v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
- Duvall v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
- Keifner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.