Legal Opinion
ProtectMarriage.com v. Bowen
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 4, 2011No. 2:09-cv-00058-MCE-DADPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs’ 1 Motion for Summary Judgment (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”), Defendants’2 Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendants’ Motion”) and Defendants’ Motion to Strike (“Motion to Strike”). These matters came on for hearing before the Court at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 20, 2011. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Defendants’ Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot.
BACKGROUND
A. Factual History
On November 4,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bailey v. Maine Commission on Governmental EthicsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012
- Chula Vista Citizens for Jobs & Fair Competition v. NorrisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Center for Az Policy v. Az Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
- Wisconsin Family Action v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022