Legal Opinion

Venable v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1993No. 92-119PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Appellant W.H.C. Venable aka Cabell Venable 1 claims the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for extension of time in which to file a notice of appeal. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm. As no appeal is now pending, we herewith direct the district court to take all appropriate steps to secure Venable’s presence in this state so that the punishment heretofore imposed may be executed without further delay.

On August 27, 1991, pursuant to a written plea agreement, Venable pleaded guilty to one felony count of embezzling $255,-109.72 from Jean Pearson…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Parke-Chapley Construction Company, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff v. Thomas F. CherringtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Martinez v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Gary Stewart Buckley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Metz v. Laramie County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Mercado v. TrujilloWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Tusshani v. AllsopWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API