Legal Opinion
Doleman v. Levine
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 29, 1935No. 574PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
In this ease certiorari was granted to resolve doubts as to the construction of § 33 of the District of Columbia Compensation Act (Longshoremen’s & Harbor Workers Compensation Act, c. 509, 44 Stat. 1424, 33 U. S. C., §§ 901 et seq., made applicable to the District of Columbia by Act of May 17, 1928, c. 612, 45 Stat. 600).
Doleman, petitioner’s intestate, in the course of his employment within the District, was struck by the automobile of respondent and received injuries which caused his death. He left surviving him his widow, and, as his heirs at law and next of kin, a brother and a dependent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mandeville v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Aetna Life Insurance v. MosesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Claim of Zirpola v. T. & E. Casselman, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Travelers Insurance v. Louis Padula Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Czaplicki v. the Hoegh SilvercloudSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Federal Marine Terminals, Inc. v. Burnside Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Vietnam Veterans of America v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Chapman v. HoageSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Komlos v. Compagnie Nationale Air FranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.