Legal Opinion

Karpe v. Borough of Stroudsburg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1983No. 3283PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in denying his claim for damages. Because this case involves the application, interpretation, and enforcement of a statute regulating the affairs of local authorities and the officers, employees and agents thereof, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 762(a)(4)(i)(A), we transfer jurisdiction over the appeal to the Commonwealth Court.

On March 9, 1977, appellant applied for and later received a permit from the Zoning Officer of the Borough of Stroudsburg, appellee, to establish an off-street parking facility. Appellee’s request that the Zoning Hearing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Valley Forge Industries, Inc. v. Armand Construction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Karpe v. Borough of StroudsburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. 84-QT. BTLS. Bianco DiVerona WineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Newman v. ThornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Rosenberg v. Holy Redeemer HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Trumbull Corp. v. Boss Construction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Smith v. Ivy Lee Real Estate, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. United Plate Glass Co. v. Metal Trims Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API