Legal Opinion
Amko International, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 2, 1998No. Slip Op. 98-160. Court No. 94-11-00718PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
In this action, Plaintiff, AMKO International Inc., challenges the classification of its imported merchandise by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”). The parties have each moved for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT R. 56. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a)(1994).
This case involves the proper classification of two types of footwear — “PU Snow Boots” and “PU Hikers” — within heading 6402 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). Upon liquidation, Customs classified Plaintiffs footwear under subheading 6402.91.50,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Canadian Wheat Board v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Tradewind Farms, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007