Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Carolina Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1947PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

Tbe defendant assigns error in tbe trial below in two respects: (1) in tbe court’s denial of its motion for judgment of nonsuit, and (2) in tbe court’s instructions to tbe jury.

Tbe plaintiffs’ evidence was sufficient to carry tbe case to tbe jury and to support tbe verdict. Notwithstanding tbe incorrect answer to tbe question in tbe application as to absence of bernia, under tbe terms of tbe policy, tbis would not defeat plaintiffs’ action on tbe policy, otherwise incontestable, unless tbe answer was made witb intent to deceive, or materially affected tbe acceptance of tbe risk and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schas v. Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Wells v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Industrial Bank of Elizabeth City v. Resolute Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sauls v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Old Colony Insurance Company v. E. W. Garvey and Wife, Mary L. GarveyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  3. Willetts v. Integon Life Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Tedder v. Union Fidelity Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1977
  5. Mayflower Insurance Exchange v. GilmontCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API