Legal Opinion
Pennington v. Didrickson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 27, 1994No. 92-3725PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs are a certified class of unemployment insurance claimants who brought action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Illinois Department of Employment Security (“IDES”). The plaintiff class challenges the definition of “base period” in section 237 of the Illinois Unemployment Insurance Act (the “IUIA”), 820 ILCS 405 /237. It maintains that the definition violates the “when due” clause of section 303(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (the “SSA”), 42 U.S.C. § 503(a)(1). Following a bench trial, the district court entered judgment for IDES. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bankers Life and Casualty Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Youakim v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Amoco Corporation (Formerly Standard Oil Company (Indiana)) and Affiliated Corporations v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. PeñaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.